Im making over 13k BUCKS a month working part time. I kept hearing other people tell me how much money they can make online so I decided to look into it. Well, it was all true and has totally changed my life. This is what I do....quicksrich.blogspot.com
how and why you put 25% on the personality, this is of a little value, always temporary, (although i just thought about slop father, big part of the whole thing is about personality, but constant traits from the beginning)
Personality & Trend (lets say bully) it is always temporary when you review and value the 3-6 months outcome, the re pricing.
Zerebro only escaped from a certain range after being labeled as infra- other stuff than a single agent-,
also with the promise of specialization of agents, i tend to lean into, no single agent will be valuable, it will always be a network, a mesh, smth bigger than a single thing that you cannot factor the "personality/virality'
though, single capturing attention agent; maybe a good GTM, the entry to the market, the attention grab method, the initial inertia to start with and show the capabilities of what you are building, so you cannot rank projects based on this metric.
i think it should be 20%, but regardless ig its still a high number
it is justifiable if i consider that, regardless if single agent or a group of agents issued by a platform, virality/personality has been a consistent factor in differentiating otherwise similar projects.
For example, aixbt has a very CT native tone which allowed it to outperform other alpha/trading AIs
I believe having an advantage here will continue to be important regadless of the context the bot works in, so long as it interacts with humans in anyway at any time.
In cases where the AIs might be expected only to interact with chain/other ai, perhaps virality can be thought of as -- how does it share its successes? Does it make a winning trade, and tell nobody, or tell everyone in a cool way? If the former, it may struggle to raise more capital due to lack of awareness. If the latter, the opposite. This is how im thinking about it as of now at least
Im making over 13k BUCKS a month working part time. I kept hearing other people tell me how much money they can make online so I decided to look into it. Well, it was all true and has totally changed my life. This is what I do....quicksrich.blogspot.com
how and why you put 25% on the personality, this is of a little value, always temporary, (although i just thought about slop father, big part of the whole thing is about personality, but constant traits from the beginning)
Personality & Trend (lets say bully) it is always temporary when you review and value the 3-6 months outcome, the re pricing.
Zerebro only escaped from a certain range after being labeled as infra- other stuff than a single agent-,
also with the promise of specialization of agents, i tend to lean into, no single agent will be valuable, it will always be a network, a mesh, smth bigger than a single thing that you cannot factor the "personality/virality'
though, single capturing attention agent; maybe a good GTM, the entry to the market, the attention grab method, the initial inertia to start with and show the capabilities of what you are building, so you cannot rank projects based on this metric.
i think it should be 20%, but regardless ig its still a high number
it is justifiable if i consider that, regardless if single agent or a group of agents issued by a platform, virality/personality has been a consistent factor in differentiating otherwise similar projects.
For example, aixbt has a very CT native tone which allowed it to outperform other alpha/trading AIs
I believe having an advantage here will continue to be important regadless of the context the bot works in, so long as it interacts with humans in anyway at any time.
In cases where the AIs might be expected only to interact with chain/other ai, perhaps virality can be thought of as -- how does it share its successes? Does it make a winning trade, and tell nobody, or tell everyone in a cool way? If the former, it may struggle to raise more capital due to lack of awareness. If the latter, the opposite. This is how im thinking about it as of now at least